quantum/debounce: rename debouncing algorithms (#9564)
* quantum/debounce: rename debouncing algorithms according to Issue 8763 This is the second attempt at implementation, with no ts_ and cy_ prefixes, since those will be implemented with macros. * Debouncing documentation: Refactor, add some generic info, and merge into a single documentpre-develop-merge-nov20 0.10.7
parent
8ac9940a76
commit
f7ccbfcea8
@ -1,43 +1,151 @@ |
|||||||
# Debounce algorithm |
# Contact bounce / contact chatter |
||||||
|
|
||||||
QMK supports multiple debounce algorithms through its debounce API. |
Mechanical switches often don't have a clean single transition between pressed and unpressed states. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In an ideal world, when you press a switch, you would expect the digital pin to see something like this: |
||||||
|
(X axis showing time |
||||||
|
``` |
||||||
|
voltage +---------------------- |
||||||
|
^ | |
||||||
|
| | |
||||||
|
| ------------------+ |
||||||
|
----> time |
||||||
|
``` |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
However in the real world you will actually see contact bounce, which will look like multiple 1->0 and 0->1 transitions, |
||||||
|
until the value finally settles. |
||||||
|
``` |
||||||
|
+-+ +--+ +------------- |
||||||
|
| | | | | |
||||||
|
| | | | | |
||||||
|
+-----------------+ +-+ +-+ |
||||||
|
``` |
||||||
|
The time it takes for the switch to settle might vary with switch type, age, and even pressing technique. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If the device chooses not to mitigate contact bounce, then often actions that happen when the switch is pressed are repeated |
||||||
|
multiple times. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
There are many ways to handle contact bounce ("Debouncing"). Some include employing additional hardware, for example an RC filter, |
||||||
|
while there are various ways to do debouncing in software too, often called debounce algorithms. This page discusses software |
||||||
|
debouncing methods available in QMK. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
While technically not considered contact bounce/contact chatter, some switch technologies are susceptible to noise, meaning, |
||||||
|
while the key is not changing state, sometimes short random 0->1 or 1->0 transitions might be read by the digital circuit, for example: |
||||||
|
``` |
||||||
|
+-+ |
||||||
|
| | |
||||||
|
| | |
||||||
|
+-----------------+ +-------------------- |
||||||
|
``` |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Many debounce methods (but not all) will also make the device resistant to noise. If you are working with a technology that is |
||||||
|
susceptible to noise, you must choose a debounce method that will also mitigate noise for you. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Types of debounce algorithms |
||||||
|
|
||||||
The logic for which debounce method called is below. It checks various defines that you have set in rules.mk |
1) Unit of time: Timestamp (milliseconds) vs Cycles (scans) |
||||||
|
* Debounce algorithms often have a 'debounce time' parameter, that specifies the maximum settling time of the switch contacts. |
||||||
|
This time might be measured in various units: |
||||||
|
* Cycles-based debouncing waits n cycles (scans), decreasing count by one each matrix_scan |
||||||
|
* Timestamp-based debouncing stores the millisecond timestamp a change occurred, and does substraction to figure out time elapsed. |
||||||
|
* Timestamp-based debouncing is usually superior, especially in the case of noise-resistant devices because settling times of physical |
||||||
|
switches is specified in units of time, and should not depend on the matrix scan-rate of the keyboard. |
||||||
|
* Cycles-based debouncing is sometimes considered inferior, because the settling time that it is able to compensate for depends on the |
||||||
|
performance of the matrix scanning code. If you use cycles-based debouncing, and you significantly improve the performance of your scanning |
||||||
|
code, you might end up with less effective debouncing. A situation in which cycles-based debouncing might be preferable is when |
||||||
|
noise is present, and the scanning algorithm is slow, or variable speed. Even if your debounce algorithm is fundamentally noise-resistant, |
||||||
|
if the scanning is slow, and you are using a timestamp-based algorithm, you might end up making a debouncing decision based on only two |
||||||
|
sampled values, which will limit the noise-resistance of the algorithm. |
||||||
|
* Currently all built-in debounce algorithms support timestamp-based debouncing only. In the future we might |
||||||
|
implement cycles-based debouncing, and it will be selectable via a ```config.h``` macro. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2) Symmetric vs Asymmetric |
||||||
|
* Symmetric - apply the same debouncing algorithm, to both key-up and key-down events. |
||||||
|
* Recommended naming convention: ```sym_*``` |
||||||
|
* Asymmetric - apply different debouncing algorithms to key-down and key-up events. E.g. Eager key-down, Defer key-up. |
||||||
|
* Recommended naming convention: ```asym_*``` followed by details of the type of algorithm in use, in order, for key-down and then key-up |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
3) Eager vs Defer |
||||||
|
* Eager - any key change is reported immediately. All further inputs for DEBOUNCE ms are ignored. |
||||||
|
* Eager algorithms are not noise-resistant. |
||||||
|
* Recommended naming conventions: |
||||||
|
* ```sym_eager_*``` |
||||||
|
* ```asym_eager_*_*```: key-down is using eager algorithm |
||||||
|
* ```asym_*_eager_*```: key-up is using eager algorithm |
||||||
|
* Defer - wait for no changes for DEBOUNCE ms before reporting change. |
||||||
|
* Defer algorithms are noise-resistant |
||||||
|
* Recommended naming conventions: |
||||||
|
* ```sym_defer_*``` |
||||||
|
* ```asym_defer_*_*```: key-down is using eager algorithm |
||||||
|
* ```asym_*_defer_*```: key-up is using eager algorithm |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
4) Global vs Per-Key vs Per-Row |
||||||
|
* Global - one timer for all keys. Any key change state affects global timer |
||||||
|
* Recommended naming convention: ```*_g``` |
||||||
|
* Per-key - one timer per key |
||||||
|
* Recommended naming convention: ```*_pk``` |
||||||
|
* Per-row - one timer per row |
||||||
|
* Recommended naming convention: ```*_pr``` |
||||||
|
* Per-key and per-row algorithms consume more resources (in terms of performance, |
||||||
|
and ram usage), but fast typists might prefer them over global. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Debounce algorithms supported by QMK |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
QMK supports multiple debounce algorithms through its debounce API. |
||||||
|
The logic for which debounce method called is below. It checks various defines that you have set in ```rules.mk``` |
||||||
|
|
||||||
``` |
``` |
||||||
DEBOUNCE_DIR:= $(QUANTUM_DIR)/debounce |
DEBOUNCE_DIR:= $(QUANTUM_DIR)/debounce |
||||||
DEBOUNCE_TYPE?= sym_g |
DEBOUNCE_TYPE?= sym_defer_g |
||||||
ifneq ($(strip $(DEBOUNCE_TYPE)), custom) |
ifneq ($(strip $(DEBOUNCE_TYPE)), custom) |
||||||
QUANTUM_SRC += $(DEBOUNCE_DIR)/$(strip $(DEBOUNCE_TYPE)).c |
QUANTUM_SRC += $(DEBOUNCE_DIR)/$(strip $(DEBOUNCE_TYPE)).c |
||||||
endif |
endif |
||||||
``` |
``` |
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Debounce selection |
### Debounce selection |
||||||
|
|
||||||
| DEBOUNCE_TYPE | Description | What else is needed | |
| DEBOUNCE_TYPE | Description | What else is needed | |
||||||
| ------------- | --------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------- | |
| ------------- | --------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------- | |
||||||
| Not defined | Use the default algorithm, currently sym_g | Nothing | |
| Not defined | Use the default algorithm, currently sym_defer_g | Nothing | |
||||||
| custom | Use your own debounce code | ```SRC += debounce.c``` add your own debounce.c and implement necessary functions | |
| custom | Use your own debounce code | ```SRC += debounce.c``` add your own debounce.c and implement necessary functions | |
||||||
| anything_else | Use another algorithm from quantum/debounce/* | Nothing | |
| Anything Else | Use another algorithm from quantum/debounce/* | Nothing | |
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Regarding split keyboards**: |
**Regarding split keyboards**: |
||||||
The debounce code is compatible with split keyboards. |
The debounce code is compatible with split keyboards. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Use your own debouncing code |
### Selecting an included debouncing method |
||||||
* Set ```DEBOUNCE_TYPE = custom```. |
Keyboards may select one of the already implemented debounce methods, by adding to ```rules.mk``` the following line: |
||||||
* Add ```SRC += debounce.c``` |
``` |
||||||
|
DEBOUNCE_TYPE = <name of algorithm> |
||||||
|
``` |
||||||
|
Where name of algorithm is one of: |
||||||
|
* ```sym_defer_g``` - debouncing per keyboard. On any state change, a global timer is set. When ```DEBOUNCE``` milliseconds of no changes has occurred, all input changes are pushed. |
||||||
|
* This is the current default algorithm. This is the highest performance algorithm with lowest memory usage, and it's also noise-resistant. |
||||||
|
* ```sym_eager_pr``` - debouncing per row. On any state change, response is immediate, followed by locking the row ```DEBOUNCE``` milliseconds of no further input for that row. |
||||||
|
For use in keyboards where refreshing ```NUM_KEYS``` 8-bit counters is computationally expensive / low scan rate, and fingers usually only hit one row at a time. This could be |
||||||
|
appropriate for the ErgoDox models; the matrix is rotated 90°, and hence its "rows" are really columns, and each finger only hits a single "row" at a time in normal use. |
||||||
|
* ```sym_eager_pk``` - debouncing per key. On any state change, response is immediate, followed by ```DEBOUNCE``` milliseconds of no further input for that key |
||||||
|
* ```sym_defer_pk``` - debouncing per key. On any state change, a per-key timer is set. When ```DEBOUNCE``` milliseconds of no changes have occurred on that key, the key status change is pushed. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### A couple algorithms that could be implemented in the future: |
||||||
|
* ```sym_defer_pr``` |
||||||
|
* ```sym_eager_g``` |
||||||
|
* ```asym_eager_defer_pk``` |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Use your own debouncing code |
||||||
|
You have the option to implement you own debouncing algorithm. To do this: |
||||||
|
* Set ```DEBOUNCE_TYPE = custom``` in ```rules.mk```. |
||||||
|
* Add ```SRC += debounce.c``` in ```rules.mk``` |
||||||
* Add your own ```debounce.c```. Look at current implementations in ```quantum/debounce``` for examples. |
* Add your own ```debounce.c```. Look at current implementations in ```quantum/debounce``` for examples. |
||||||
* Debouncing occurs after every raw matrix scan. |
* Debouncing occurs after every raw matrix scan. |
||||||
* Use num_rows rather than MATRIX_ROWS, so that split keyboards are supported correctly. |
* Use num_rows rather than MATRIX_ROWS, so that split keyboards are supported correctly. |
||||||
|
* If the algorithm might be applicable to other keyboards, please consider adding it to ```quantum/debounce``` |
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Changing between included debouncing methods |
### Old names |
||||||
You can either use your own code, by including your own debounce.c, or switch to another included one. |
The following old names for existing algorithms will continue to be supported, however it is recommended to use the new names instead. |
||||||
Included debounce methods are: |
|
||||||
* eager_pr - debouncing per row. On any state change, response is immediate, followed by locking the row ```DEBOUNCE``` milliseconds of no further input for that row. |
|
||||||
For use in keyboards where refreshing ```NUM_KEYS``` 8-bit counters is computationally expensive / low scan rate, and fingers usually only hit one row at a time. This could be |
|
||||||
appropriate for the ErgoDox models; the matrix is rotated 90°, and hence its "rows" are really columns, and each finger only hits a single "row" at a time in normal use. |
|
||||||
* eager_pk - debouncing per key. On any state change, response is immediate, followed by ```DEBOUNCE``` milliseconds of no further input for that key |
|
||||||
* sym_g - debouncing per keyboard. On any state change, a global timer is set. When ```DEBOUNCE``` milliseconds of no changes has occured, all input changes are pushed. |
|
||||||
* sym_pk - debouncing per key. On any state change, a per-key timer is set. When ```DEBOUNCE``` milliseconds of no changes have occured on that key, the key status change is pushed. |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* sym_g - old name for sym_defer_g |
||||||
|
* eager_pk - old name for sym_eager_pk |
||||||
|
* sym_pk - old name for sym_defer_pk |
||||||
|
* eager_pr - old name for sym_eager_pr |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -1,28 +0,0 @@ |
|||||||
Debounce algorithms belong in this folder. |
|
||||||
Here are a few ideas |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1) Global vs Per-Key vs Per-Row |
|
||||||
* Global - one timer for all keys. Any key change state affects global timer |
|
||||||
* Per key - one timer per key |
|
||||||
* Per row - one timer per row |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
2) Eager vs symmetric vs asymmetric |
|
||||||
* Eager - any key change is reported immediately. All further inputs for DEBOUNCE ms are ignored. |
|
||||||
* Symmetric - wait for no changes for DEBOUNCE ms before reporting change |
|
||||||
* Asymmetric - wait for different times depending on key-down/key-up. E.g. Eager key-down, DEBOUNCE ms key up. |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
3) Timestamp vs cycles |
|
||||||
* old old old code waits n cycles, decreasing count by one each matrix_scan |
|
||||||
* newer code stores the millisecond the change occurred, and does subraction to figure out time elapsed. |
|
||||||
* Timestamps are superior, i don't think cycles will ever be used again once upgraded. |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The default algorithm is symmetric and global. |
|
||||||
Here are a few that could be implemented: |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
sym_g.c |
|
||||||
sym_pk.c |
|
||||||
sym_pr.c |
|
||||||
sym_pr_cycles.c |
|
||||||
eager_g.c |
|
||||||
eager_pk.c |
|
||||||
eager_pr.c //could be used in ergo-dox! |
|
Loading…
Reference in new issue